|
CURRICULUM VITAE
Objective:
To
participate in a joint research project in the field of dairy
sheep genetic evaluations.
Permanent position:
Associate professor - Bioinformatics and Population Genetics
Professional experience:
-
Genetic evaluations in dairy sheep, cattle and buffaloes - genetic
parameters and breeding values, formulation/construction of
breeding criteria.
-
Study of factors influencing the production traits, methods of
their accounting.
-
Construction of selection systems for obtaining a better genetic
gain.
Education:
Ph.D. - Agricultural Academy, Sofia, Bulgaria. 1979
Major: Sheep Breeding
Dissertation: Comparison of methods for predicting breeding values
of rams for milk yield.
M.S. Agricultural Academy, Sofia, Bulgaria. 1975
Major: Animal Genetics.
Dissertation: Effect of inbreeding level on heritability and
genetic correlations in silkworm (Bombix mori).
Agricultural Academy student (zootechnics) 1970 – 1974
5-th Sofia secondary scientific school. 1966 - 1968
Research activity:
Research interests:
Genetic analyses of animal breeding data, studying new traits in
dairy sheep, constructing of breeding plans, building FORTRAN
programs for analyses of variance components, BLUP breeding values
and selection indices, fifteen years experience in PC computer
programming. Modeling of genetic gain in different systems of
selection and methods for breeding values estimation. Systems of
selection in a big number small sized herds. Implementation of the
understanding for genetic values in the herd breeding practice.
Implementation of extension service in animal husbandry.
Research activity:
International scientific meeting and conferences attended - 15;
research support grants - 3; scientific papers in the field of
sheep, cattle and buffalo breeding, sheep physiology and
reproduction - 50 (see appendix).
Computer skills:
statistics, computer programming (FORTRAN).
Teaching experience:
Advisor of four Master of science post graduate students in sheep
breeding - 1985 - 1990
Other experience:
-
FAO International Project for Red Cattle Breeds comparison in
Bulgaria. 1982 - 1984
-
Standardizing methods for ram genetic evaluation in Eastern
Europe, coordinator. 1988 - 1989
-
FAO project “Strengthening Agricultural Policy-making and Economic
Services Capability” in Bulgaria. TCP/BUL/ 2352(A). National
consultant. 1994 - 1995
-
Experience in working in international teams.
Study, research trips and employment abroad:
-
Agricultural University of Norway. “Systems of selection in dairy
cattle”. 1981.
-
Lincoln University - Missouri, USA. ”Extension Service Activity in
Cattle and Sheep Farming, Breeding and Marketing”. 1991
-
University of Nebraska - Lincoln, USA. Employed as a Post Doc in
the project: “Sire by Herd Interaction for Yield Traits in
Holsteins”. 1992 - 1994
Languages:
Bulgarian (mother thong).
English - read, speak, write - very good.
Russian - read, write, speak - very good.
Other skills and hobbies:
swimming, skiing, bridge.
Personal history:
Born - 23 April 1950 in Sofia.
Citizenship at birth and present - Bulgarian.

Prof. dr
George Yakimov Dimov
RESEARCH SUMMARY
Findings and areas of interest in the field of sheep breeding.
1.
The influence of duration of period from lambing to first test day
on yield traits of dairy sheep.
2.
Dairy sheep information is summarized for over 70 000 lactations
for the period of 1980-87.
3.
A new trait in dairy sheep is formulated - type of lactation
curve. Factors influencing it, its inheritance and connections
with the other traits were the aim of an enhanced study.
Classification of the research
1.
Influence of nongenetic effects on traits
1.1. Traits
Sheep - milk yield, lactation period, maximum daily yield,
persistency of lactation, type of lactation curve;
1.2. Factors
Year, farm, herd, month of lambing, duration of first control
period, type of lactation curve.
1.3. Correction of nongenetic effects
Additive and multiplicative corrections which are performed before
the genetic evaluation. (ANOVA1)
1.4. Simplifying of milk recording in dairy sheep
Prediction of milk yield for complete lactation or commercial
yield (after weaning, e.g. for milking only period) based on two
test day records. Breed differences, season and age effects.
2.
Genetic parameters
2.1. Methods
- intraclass correlation, no computers, later on Becker’s
(1968) methods on CPM and DOS type machines.
- approaches - without correction for nongenetic effects,
preliminary correction, simultaneously in the model - REML (single
and multiple trait).
- correlations among estimates of variances (additive,
permanent environmental and residual) show a pattern of
complementarity.
3.
Selection indices
3.1. Information from several traits
Milk yield and persistency, weights as difference from the
breeding goal. Weights does not influence the index, summation of
standardized rams’ EPD rank them similarly.
3.2. Information from several relatives for sex restricted
traits
Empirical regressions of several relatives on rams’ progeny
testing.
Theoretical study on increasing accuracy based on own phenotype
when dams’ and paternal half-sib information is accounted for.
Accuracy of preliminary (at weaning) estimation of BV for milk
yield, based on descendent and co-laterals.
Combining six types of relatives in a simulation MOET - ONBS
study.
4.
Study on breeding values
4.1. Non genetic effects
Correlations between rams’ EPDs for milk yield dropped down to
0.48 when complex of fixed effects differ.
4.2. Complex estimate on several traits
For
dairy and merino rams standardized EPDs were combined with
relative importance of four traits e.g. a simplification of
selection index.
5.
Developing of computer programs
5.1. Non genetic effects – ANOVA
Allows an arbitrary number if cross-classified effects, or one
nested within the main with several linear regressions. Direct
inversion of design matrix. Tested with up to 1500 levels of a
factor. Results - mean, SD, min. and max. of trait and
regressions, F-test, LS-estimates, R2 (determination
coef.), T-test.
Variant - ANOVA1. Additive correction for all/significant
fixed effects; output - prepares an input file for H2RG.
5.2. Heritability and genetic correlations - H2RG.
No
restriction for sire number, allows missing data, based on
Beckers’ methods, input file for selection index.
5.3. Selection index SI.
Arbitrary number of traits.
5.4. BLUP sires EPD program (sire model) - SOGO.
Progeny testing for unlimited number of rams and relatively small
number of fixed effects.
6.
Breeding programs
6.1. Predicted generation/year genetic gain of cattle and
sheep populations with different:
-
proportion of population inseminated with young sires;
-
number of progenies for estimation of breeding values;
-
intensity of selection of young and progeny tested sires (bulls,
rams).
6.2. Prediction genetic gain for buffaloes with progeny testing
and with MOET without progeny testing.
SUMMARY OF SOME RESULTS
1.
Types of lactation curves in dairy ewes (Dimov, 1986).
Data: One year, 394 first and 355 second lactations, 9 herds, 25
sires, minimum № daughters - 12.
Table 1.
Averages
|
Type of lact. curve |
№ observ. |
Milk yield in l
Mean (SD) |
Lactat. period
Mean (SD) |
Max. daily in l
Mean (SD) |
|
I |
267 |
170 (21) |
236 (16) |
1.16 (0.17) |
|
II |
257 |
175 (19) |
229 (12) |
1.26 (0.16) |
|
III |
225 |
169 (19) |
236 (11) |
1.17 (0.19) |
Table 2.
F-test
|
Trait |
|
Type I |
Type II |
Type III |
|
Lactat. number
df = 1 |
F |
0.01 |
26.4 *** |
28.0 *** |
|
R2 % |
0.0 |
3.3 |
3.6 |
|
Herd
df = 8 |
F |
3.3 *** |
14.8 *** |
14.2 *** |
|
R2 % |
3.4 |
13.7 |
13.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ram
df = 24 |
F |
0.9 |
2.0 ** |
1.9 ** |
|
R2 % |
4.1 |
8.5 |
8.2 |
|
h2 |
- 0.12 |
0.18 |
0.17 |
2.
Non genetic effects on rams’ EPD for milk yield (Dimov,
1992).
Data: 2214 Pleven Black-head dairy ewes, 28 herds, only first
lactation, years of birth 1982-85, month of lambing - December -
March, minimum 9 daughters.
I
c.p. - first control period, e.g. from lambing to I test day -
n.s. in the model.
Average yield - 212,7 l (SD 37.6), Lactation period - 225.7 days
(SD 26.2), Yield for standard 200 days period - 200.5 l (SD 36.5).
Terms: Residual variance (MSE) x10-3, SD of EPD (SD
epd). Assumed h2 = 0.25
|
Effect |
Milk yield for lactation |
200 days yield |
|
Model № |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
|
Farm (F) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Herd (H) |
|
|
|
|
+ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year (Y) |
|
|
+ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Month (M) |
|
|
|
+ |
|
|
|
|
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
|
|
Lac. days |
|
+ |
|
|
|
|
+ |
|
+ |
+ |
|
|
|
| |